Irish Republican Information Service 


In this issue 01/27/2012

1. 24 hour protest fast by Republican prisoners

2.  Republican POW denied release to attend father�s funeral

3. Rioting erupts in  Derry following RUC raids

4. Martin McGuinness afraid of debate on Scottish  independence debate

5. Cork protest in support of Republican POWs

6.  Protest outside Craigavon court

7. No welcome for Crown Forces in  Galway

8. No honour should be given to Margaret Thatcher by UCC Fine  Gael

9. Duffy released, Shivers convicted in Massareene trial

10. Hooded  men support Bloody Sunday march

11. Bloody Sunday relatives want Paras  'hunted down like Nazis'

12. Martin McGuinness prepared to meet Queen in  future

13. Sell-off of 26-County State assets

14. The numbers that sum up  modern smalltown Ireland

15. Emigration in Ireland not �a free choice of  lifestyle�

16. Kilmihil�s missing generation 

17. The detention of  IRA veteran Marian Price harks back to internment

18. Hunger-striker's  daughter denounces Provisionals

19. The Boston College IRA tapes controversy  -- a reply to Niall O�Dowd

20. US judge finds no basis to stop release of IRA  interviews

21. Free Marian Price and Martin Corey: PFC

22. Israel passes  law tantamount to internment


 1. 24 hour protest fast by Republican prisoners

 

IN A statement on January 22, Geraldine McNamara, PRO, Republican Sinn  Fein, said that the Republican POWs in Maghaberry Jail were to commence a  24-hour-fast on January 23, 2012 in protest of the decision by David Ford and  the Prison Administration in the Occupied Six Counties to refuse compassionate  parole for POW Damien McKenna to attend his father�s funeral on Thursday,  January 19.

 

Damien applied for compassionate parole to attend his father�s funeral in  Lurgan on January 19 and was refused on the grounds that he is a protesting  prisoner. Damien, along with his comrades in Maghaberry prison, is engaged in a  protest against strip-searching and in defence of the historic right of  Republican prisoners to political status.

 

All these issues could have easily been resolved Geraldine McNamara said  and �would have been resolved but for the fact that the prisoners are political  prisoners and like their comrades of 30 years ago who died on hunger strike, the  British establishment in Ireland will do everything in its power to break the  prisoners both mentally and physically.

 

�Being allowed parole to go to a family member�s funeral is a basic human  right and should not be denied to anyone. The prisoners saw no option but to go  on a protest solidarity fast with Damien to highlight this inhuman decision.

 

�Republican Sinn Féin asks that everyone concerned with Human Rights abuses  and prisoner welfare support this action�.

 

2. Republican POW denied release to attend father�s funeral

 

THE POW Department, Republican Sinn Féin, said in a statement on January 18  that the decision of the Stormont Justice Department to deny a Republican  prisoner compassionate parole to attend his father�s funeral exposed the  inhumanity of the British Prison service when dealing with Republican  prisoners.

 

Spokesperson Josephine Hayden continued: �Damien McKenna of Lurgan applied  for compassionate parole to attend his father�s funeral in Lurgan on January 19  and was refused on the grounds that he is a protesting prisoner. Damien, along  with his comrades in Maghaberry prison, is engaged in a protest against  strip-searching and in defence of the historic right of Republican prisoners to  political status.

 

�Once more the real face of British rule in Ireland shows itself. Britain  and their hirelings have learned nothing over the course of centuries of  occupation. Thirty-one years after the brutality of the H-Blocks and the hunger  strikes of 1981 yet another group of Irish Republican prisoners are being  brutalised by a prison system designed to break the spirit of resistance. Irish  history teaches us it will have the opposite effect and will instead galvanise  the spirits of the POWs in their struggle for a free Ireland.

 

�Our thoughts and sympathies are with Damien McKenna and his family in  their sad loss.�

 

3. Rioting erupts in Derry following RUC raids

 

A CROWD of around 30 attacked the RUC/PSNI on January 23 with stones,  bottles, petrol and paint bombs at Cromore Gardens and Lislane Drive in the  Creggan area of Derry city shortly after 6pm. Rioting lasted until 10pm when the  RUC/PSNI moved out of the area having finished their searches in Kildrum  Gardens.

 

It is believed that some members of the Creggan community were angry over  RUC/PSNI searches of a home which they say started at 3pm and lasted until 10pm  � seven hours in total. Raids were said to have been made on the homes of a  pensioner, the wife of a POW who is recovering from cancer, and the parents of a  newborn child.

 

In another raid a six-week-old child was removed from his home; and when  refused use of the toilet, RUC/PSNI officers threatened to �piss all over the  house�, although not before spitting all over the kitchen. 

 

Local Provo Councillor and Deputy Mayor Kevin Campbell condemned the riot  saying �The police were there to do a job.�  What short memories they have  - the more things change, the more they stay the same. The conduct of the  British police has not changed since the day before, on and after Bloody Sunday;  it is still despicable. But the conduct of the provos has changed � they were  easily bought and have accepted the colonial outfit.

 

4. Martin McGuinness afraid of debate on Scottish independence debate

 

GERALDINE McNamara, PRO, Republican Sinn Féin, said on January 23 that  Martin McGuinness showed his true colours when he said �Northern Irish (sic)  politicians should avoid getting involved in the debate over independence for  Scotland and that the debate should not be allowed to cause division in the  region.�

 

She said: �Why is Martin Mcguinness afraid to debate Scottish independence?  Is it because it will show very clearly how his own party have given up the  cause of Irish independence and sold out the ideals of those who fought for  Irish freedom.

 

�While the Scottish people are looking at ways of breaking the connection  with England Martin McGuinness and the Provisionals have, since 1986, gone down  the road of copper-fastening England�s hold on the Occupied Six Counties.

 

�They now uphold British rule in Ireland and are Crown ministers in  Stormont, and encourage Irish people to join the RUC/PSNI. He is willing to meet  his Queen Elizabeth II and do whatever it takes to oppress Republicans who  oppose British rule in Ireland and will not sell out Ireland�s cause like he  did.

 

�Speaking about the Scottish independence debate he said �This is an issue  which could be used to create divisions in this house [Stormont] or even in our  Executive or even between the First Minister and myself.  What happens  elsewhere has to be a matter primarily for the people concerned and my attitude  to it is we would be best advised to stay clear of it.�

 

�Many people with Scottish connections fought for Ireland�s freedom, not  least James Connolly who gave his life in 1916. Now as we fast approach the  centenary of his death, Ireland still remains under the British yoke.

 

�Martin McGuinness shows clearly that his loyalty is to the British  government and not those who seek Irish or Scottish independence.�

 

5. Cork protest in support of Republican POWs

 

ON Saturday, January 21 a public protest took place at Daunt Square, Cork  City. The protest was organised by the Prisoner Solidarity Group, Cork  City. 

 

The Prisoner Solidarity Group is an independent group which opposes  internment by Section 30 in the 26 Counties, or internment by remand in the  Occupied Six Counties, and calls for the repatriation of Republican prisoners  held overseas. They intend to organise regular protests in solidarity with all  Republican prisoners to highlight the ongoing struggle in Maghaberry  prison. 

 

Among the various groups attending was Republican Sinn Féin. The protest  called for the implementation of the August 2010 agreement which has yet to be  implemented by the Northern Ireland Prison Service (NIPS). 

 

Since the closure of the notorious H-Blocks, Maghaberry prison has become  the destination of Republicans who have been interned, �held on remand�  (internment) or imprisoned as a result of their opposition to the British  presence in Ireland. 

 

Republican Sinn Féin distributed leaflets to members of the public  highlighting this injustice and the ongoing censorship by the British and their  two puppet partition states in the Twenty-Six and Six Counties.

 

6. Protest outside Craigavon court

 

Members and supporters of Republican Sinn Féin held a picket outside  Craigavon Court, Co Armagh on November 10 and 12 as the trial began of 15 people  charged with taking part in what the RUC/PSNI claim was an �illegal  parade�. 

 

The parade, which took place on January 23, 2011, demanded the release of  political hostage Martin Corey held without charge or trial for over 18 months.  Martin is currently awaiting a judicial review of his illegal detention.   

 

Thise charges include Republican Sinn Fein President Des Dalton and  Vice-President Fearghal Moore along with many other members. 

 

In a statement on January 7, Republican Sinn Féin described the  prosecutions as an attack on the right to publicly express a political opinion.

 

"In the Middle East people are being applauded for coming out on to the  streets to demand political change but in the Occupied Six Counties Irish people  are being prosecuted by the British state for doing the same thing. The  prosecution of people for participating in a protest march - held on January 23  last to call for the release of veteran Lurgan Republican Martin Corey who has  been held without trial in Maghaberry prison since April 2010 - is clearly an  attempt to force Irish Republicans off the streets and to silence anyone who  refuses to accept British occupation.

 

"Not for the first time Irish Republicans find themselves before a British  Court for upholding the principle of "the right of the people of Ireland to the  ownership of Ireland" and in defiance of  laws designed to silence the  voice of protest. This political trial puts the political reality of the  Six-County state under the spotlight and shows it to be still fundamentally  undemocratic."

 

The trial will recommence on March 8.

Trouble, but not the  troubles

Alex Thomson, Chief Correspondent Channel Four News blog:

 

Outside the main door of Court Number 1 in Craigavon it�s like a throwback  to the old days of Crumlin Road Courthouse in Belfast.

Inches away from each  other, the police and defendants. The guardians of the state and the Republicans  who would see it done away with for their United Ireland.

The old green  police uniforms and flak jackets of the RUC long gone, in favour of the modern  whites and blacks of the Police Service of Northern Ireland.

 

Equally, the Republicans� Celtic shirts have also changed with the  years.

The defendants � and there are 15 or so of them, are largely from  Republican Sinn Fein which still believes in fighting for a united Ireland �  with force if need be.

And yet the issue before District Judge Bates is  hardly the stuff of the Troubles; bombing, gun attacks and so forth.

 

Bizarrely it is utterly mundane. However, the British state � busily  cutting so many other aspects of public life � seems to be throwing everything  at this weird case.

No. These would-be Republican revolutionaries stand  charged with nothing more than holding a peaceful protest march a year  ago.

 

Not much happened, some music and a few score Republicans marching around  the streets of Lurgan to protest at the treatment of one of their  prisoners.

Their crime is not seeking prior permission from the authorities  of a state they do not recognise, to walk the streets and hold their  placards.

Because they don�t recognise the jurisdiction of the British state,  they were not about to seek permission.

So, charged under Parades Legislation  designed to govern marches of a more Orange hue then green, this bizarre case  unfolds.

Lawyers, at least 13 police officers called as witnesses and  half-a-dozen defence lawyers � the latter openly amazed that the British state  is bothering.

Republican Sinn Fein�s President and Vice-President sit in the  dock. It�s too small to accommodate all the others.

 

The cost must run to hundreds of thousands of pounds already and the state  has yet to finish its case.

Why bother? Upholding the law is all well and  good but, if guilty, many of these defendants will likely refuse to pay any  fines.

Therefore short prison terms and martyr-creation and yet more expense  for a hard-pressed state appear the only outcomes.

Curiouser and  curiouser.

 


 

7. No welcome for Crown Forces in Galway

 

REPUBLICAN Sinn Féin Gaillimh wish to bring to the attention of the public  a shameful PR stunt by British Crown Forces and facilitated by the College  Football Association of Ireland. 

 

On Tuesday, January 24 in Terryland Park, a soccer match was played between  the 26-County army and the British Royal Air Force, and on January 26 at 12pm  the Colleges FAI will play the same British Royal Air Force at Drom, Co Galway,  in what is termed a �friendly�, set up by the Free State Army. 

 

Republican Sinn Féin wish to state that there is nothing �friendly� about  the British Royal Air Force or any of the British Crown Forces. The British  Royal Air Force have murdered thousands of innocent men, women and children in  the illegal wars that are currently taking place in Afghanistan and  Iraq. 

 

The British Royal Air Force is a branch of the British Crown Forces which  is currently occupying a number of countries including part of our own. These PR  stunts are taking place while our countrymen are on dirty protest in Maghaberry  Jail in Co Antrim. 

 

Republican Sinn Féin calls on all Republicans and the public to oppose  these attempts at normalisation by attending our protest at Drom at 11.30am on  the Thursday January 26.

 

8. No honour should be given to Margaret Thatcher by UCC Fine Gael

 

�THE DECISION by the student Fine Gael members in UCC to consider Margaret  Thatcher as an honorary life member is an insult to those who suffered and lost  their lives during Maggie�s reign of terror� said Geraldine McNamara, National  PRO, Republican Sinn Féin on January 17.

 

�Any self-respecting Irish person who knows anything about Irish history or  the hunger strikes during 1981 would feel nothing but contempt for the Iron Lady  as she became known because of her inhumanity towards others.

 

�Those who suffered included the Welsh miners and the people from the north  of England where she found little support because of the austerity measures  towards the working classes which included the Poll tax. 

 

�Little funding was given to towns like Liverpool and Manchester during her  reign and at that time there were riots in many areas such as Mossside and  Toxteth because of the poverty endured by the inhabitants there. In the mining  towns and villages people were starved into submission because they went on  strike for a just wage and decent working conditions. Many lost their lives  during this time; many were imprisoned because they stood by the unions.

 

�During the Malvinas war she again showed contempt for human life and many  sailors lost their lives when the ship the General Belgrano was torpedoed in  international waters.

Margaret Thatcher should be seen as a war criminal and  nothing else. Her age and time distance does not exonerate her. No honour should  be bestowed upon her. �

 

9. Colin Duffy released, Brian Shivers convicted in Massareene trial

 

The case of the two men charged with the killing of two British soldiers at  the gates of Massereene barracks in Antrim on March 7, 2009, saw one released  and one convicted of the killings. 

 

Brian Shivers was found guilty at Antrim Crown Court on January 20 while  Colin Duffy was freed by the court. 

 

British Army sappers Patrick Azimkar, 21, from London, and Mark Quinsey,  23, from Birmingham were shot dead as they collected a pizza from outside the  barracks. Two delivery men were injured    

 

Judge Anthony Hart told the court that in the case of Colin Duffy he  considerd �that there is insufficient evidence to satisfy me beyond reasonable  doubt that whatever Duffy may have done when he wore the latex glove, or touched  the seatbelt buckle, meant that he was preparing the car in some way for this  murderous attack. And I therefore find him not guilty.�

 

The Diplock non-jury trial lasted six weeks. It ended just before Christmas  and Justice Hart took four weeks to consider his verdicts. The soldiers from the  38 Engineer Regiment were about to begin a tour of duty in Afghanistan when they  were killed.

 

Brian Shivers was told in 2008 that he had five or six years to live with  cystic fibrosis.

 

He was allowed bail because of his illness but Cilin Duffy spent almost  three years on remand in Maghaberry jail. He appeared in court with long hair  and a beard to his chest as the Republican prisoners on protest are not shaving  or cutting their hair.

 

Shivers�s father Pat was a plasterer from Toomebridge, Co Derry. His  father, a civil rights activist, was one of 12 internees known as �the hooded  men�. In August 1971, they were stripped naked, dressed in boiler suits, forced  to stand in a search position, beaten, subjected to white noise, and deprived of  food, water and sleep for eight days.

 

In a case supported by the 26-County government, the European Court of  Human Rights found the British government guilty of �inhuman and degrading  treatment�.

 

10. Hooded men support Bloody Sunday march

 

THE following statement was released by some of the men who were tortured  by the British State following their arrest on August 9, 1971. These men became  known as �The Hooded Men�, and their torture is described by John McGuffin in  his book �The Guineapigs� (1974, 1981). It can be read at: http://www.irishresistancebooks.com/guineapigs/guineapigs.htm

 

�Forty years ago the Stormont government banned the Civil Rights march  scheduled to take place in Derry on January 30, 1972. The ban was unsuccessful,  but the British Tory government followed through its counter-insurgency  strategy, which began with the introduction of internment in 1971, by shooting  down peaceful marchers who came out on the streets in defiance of state terror.  Today, another Tory government and its middle-management in Stormont denies  human and civil rights by upholding internment while also trying, by some rather  desperate means, to prevent people from marching again in defence of these  rights. On January 29, we, as former Long Kesh internees, will join the march  that will mark the fortieth anniversary of Bloody Sunday in Derry. We will march  under a banner calling for an end to internment in 2012, and our numbers will  include survivors of the �hooded treatment�, who were tortured in August 1971.  We now call on every ex-internee and ex-prisoner who reads this letter to join  us and help carry our banner. 

 

�People are now being held without trial in the Six Counties at the whim of  an English Secretary of State. This present-day internment is the same in all  but name as that introduced in August 1971, and is the same type of repression  that people marched against so bravely in January 1972. We oppose internment no  matter how the British decide to implement it � whether via the �suspension of  license�, the denial of pardons, the use of non-jury courts and the gamut of  other repressive legislation at their disposal. We will march in defence of  human rights, in protest against present-day internment and in opposition to the  torture that continues to be practiced by the British state in Ireland and  abroad. In doing so, we will salute the memory of the brave men, women and  children who once marched for our freedom and who were murdered, wounded and  brutalised by the British army on the streets of Derry forty years ago. We will  also remember our friends who died prematurely as a result of the torture - Pat  Shivers from Toomebridge, Mickey Montgomery from Derry and Seán McKenna from  Newry.

 

�The march that took place on January 30, 1972, was a protest against  internment and torture � crimes that were employed by the British state to  terrorise the population of the six counties. All of the demands raised by the  popular Civil Rights Movement, which the Bloody Sunday massacre was designed to  destroy, remain unfulfilled. Today, the right to decent housing and jobs is  denied to young people across Ireland, while the uninhibited use of stop and  search powers targets not just adults but even children on their way to and from  school. Along with widespread [RUC]/PSNI brutality during arrests, raids and  other, more �routine� incidences of harassment, these abuses underline the six  counties� enduring status and notoriety as a police state.

 

�The order to commit mass murder was issued in Derry just as it was to deal  with every other popular anti-colonial insurgency against British rule. These  repressive policies remain central to British state strategy today: internment  is still taking place in Ireland, while prisoners in Maghaberry jail are, on a  daily basis, subjected to strip-search torture. These human rights abuses do not  end here: through their army and intelligence agencies, the British continue to  torture prisoners abroad, both in British-occupied territory and on behalf of  dictator-clients like Muammar Gadaffi via practices such as �rendition�,  abduction and outright murder.

 

�Let no individual or political party imagine that they are the exclusive  owners of the Bloody Sunday march. The people of Derry mobilised in January 1972  in a courageous, brilliant and popular protest against internment, and in  defence of universal human rights. Their bravery continues to inspire people  across the world, and their example will always have a truly global resonance;  therefore, we believe that the fortieth anniversary Bloody Sunday march should  take place, because human rights and civil rights are still being denied by the  British state and its agents in Stormont.

 

�We call on everybody who believes in these basic and universal rights to  join the march and show their opposition to the continuation of repression,  internment and torture, wherever it may occur. In doing so, we will all mark the  fortieth anniversary of Bloody Sunday and inspire the world again by declaring  that no apology from any British government will ever be acceptable while they  and their allies continue to terrorise those who stand up against oppression and  believe in freedom. By coming on this march, we will help build a great and  enduring monument to the memory of all of those who died protesting against  internment and defending all of our civil rights.

 

Michael Donnelly, Derry

Gerry McKerr, Lurgan

Patrick McNally,  Armagh

Brian Turley, Armagh

Francie McGuigan, Belfast

Kevin Hannaway,  Belfast

Joe Clark, Belfast

Jim Auld, Belfast�

 

11.Bloody Sunday relatives want Paras �hunted down like Nazi war  criminals�

 

IN an interview with Suzanne Breen in the Sunday World newspaper on January  22, 2012 relatives of the Bloody Sunday victims said they want the British  paratroopers who murdered their loved ones tracked down and prosecuted �like  Nazi war criminals�.

 

They are furious that a full 19 months after the Saville report was  published none of the soldiers responsible have been charged.

 

Next Sunday, January 29, marks the 40th anniversary of the atrocity which  sent shockwaves around the world. Some relatives of those who died now claim the  £200 million Saville inquiry was a waste of time.

 

Kate Nash, whose teenage brother Willie was killed, said: �All Saville did  is make lawyers on both sides rich. It was no triumph for us. Saville found the  paras guilty of murdering 14 innocent civilians yet nobody has been prosecuted.  We want those responsible for the slaughter in the dock, and next Sunday we'll  be marching to demand justice for our loved ones.�

 

The planned march to the iconic nationalist landmark of Free Derry Corner  has deeply divided the Bloody Sunday families. While some like the Nash sisters  support the demonstration, many others believe the days of taking to the streets  to commemorate the dead are over.

 

Willie Nash (19), the younger brother of Irish Olympic boxer Charlie Nash,  was shot dead as he went to help another victim. Kate said: �It wasn't enough  for the soldiers to murder my wee brother.

 

�They mutilated his body and stole from him. A ring was taken from his  finger and a cross and chain from his neck. They robbed money from his pocket  too. The soldiers shot Willie in the chest and kidneys.

 

�Then, they dragged him along the ground by the roots of his hair. When we  got Willie back, his hair was literally standing on its ends. There were marks  all over his body. His mouth was half-open and his teeth were covered in  blood.�

 

Accusing the paras of war crimes, Kate said: �Nazi war criminals are still  hunted down no matter how old or ill they are. They're even carried into court  on stretchers.

 

�There are double standards here. Our loved ones deserve the same justice.  Fourteen innocent people were gunned down in cold blood. David Cameron's nice  words of apology mean nothing without prosecutions.�

 

Kate told the Sunday World how, in the hours after the shooting,  soldiers and policemen taunted her brother Charlie: �On our way to the morgue,  we were stopped at an Army checkpoint.

 

�They knew Charlie from the boxing and started to goad him about Willie  being dead. Even though he was a boxer, Charlie was a lovely, gentle fellow who  never got into fights. But hearing insults about Willie before his body was cold  was too much. We had to grab Charlie and hold him back.�

 

Kate described the horrific scene in the morgue: �The dead bodies were all  lying there. Charlie had to pull sheet after sheet off each corpse until he  found Willie. It was an awful experience for him.�

 

A policeman in the morgue then taunted the grieving boxer that his family  had one less member now. �The priest restrained Charlie at that point,� his  sister recalled.

 

Kate revealed how Bloody Sunday had wrecked her family. Her father Alex,  who was on the march too, saw his son being shot. He ran out to help Willie.  Alex was also shot but survived.

 

�Somebody said to my mother, �At least you've got your husband� and she  replied, �I'd rather have my son�," recalled Kate. �It was a mother's natural  reaction. She blamed daddy because he survived and he blamed himself too. He'd  say, �Why wasn't it me? I've lived my life� which was nonsense because he was  only 51.�

 

The Bloody Sunday paras were later awarded medals by the Queen and their  commander Col Derek Wilford received an OBE.

 

Linda Nash, Kate's sister, said: �After Saville, all honours should have  been immediately stripped from these men. The fact they weren't is a huge insult  to the dead and we won't rest until it happens.�

 

Next weekend's march will be led by women relatives of Bloody Sunday  victims carrying wreaths. Behind them, others will hold black flags. No  politicians will address the rally. The only speakers will be those who lost  loved ones. The event will close with the singing of the civil rights' anthem,  �We Shall Overcome�.

 

Many Blood Sunday relatives are against the march, including John Kelly  whose 17-year-old brother Michael was murdered. �The vast majority of families  believe the annual march has served its purpose,� Kelly said.

 

�Our campaign has achieved its goals. We've highlighted the lies and  injustice carried out by the British Army and government. We are commemorating  Bloody Sunday but at a memorial service next weekend at the monument to the  dead.�

 

Liam Wray, whose 22-year-old brother Jim was killed, will address the  march. He said David Cameron's apology was �only five per cent� of what should  have happened.

 

�I want the soldier who murdered my brother charged � to recognise Jim's  humanity. But if he admitted his guilt in court, I'd see no point in jailing  him. Too much focus has been on the soldiers.

 

�Where justice hasn't been done is regarding the politicians who sent the  soldiers out and then defended them, the forensic scientists and the  civil-servants who took part in the cover-up � all these people have escaped  censure.�

 

Wray claimed the annual march is �a beacon of light� to those oppressed by  �armies across the world in Afghanistan, Palestine and Iraq�. He added: �While  there's breath in my body, I'll be marching.�

 

Mickey Bridge, a steward at the demonstration 40 years ago, was among the  14 people injured. He'll also take part in next weekend's march. �Bloody Sunday  was state-sponsored murder and the rest is waffle,� he said.

 

�The prosecution service have the Saville report. I can't understand the  delay. The evidence is there. Were it anybody but British soldiers we wouldn't  be waiting 19 months later. People would have been immediately charged.�

 

Damien �Bubbles� Donaghey, then a 15-year-old teenager, was the first  person to be shot on Bloody Sunday. He spent seven months in hospital  recovering. A leg injury still gives him terrible pain and he's due to undergo  further surgery later this year.

 

�At the Saville inquiry, Soldier �A� who shot me didn't even have the guts  to look me in the face. He hasn't been prosecuted but that's not the worst.  Soldier �F� who killed four people and wounded four more hasn't been charged  either,� Donaghey said.

 

But he's most angry that senior Army officers escaped blame in Saville:  �Everything was lumped on one officer, Col Wilford, and nine squaddies. They  were just �bad apples�.

 

�The military and political establishment who took key decisions � and are  even more guilty � got off the hook. Next Sunday, it's important we remember  that.�

-- Suzanne Breen, Sunday World, January 23, 2012

 

12. Martin McGuinness prepared to meet Queen in future

 

MARTIN McGuinness, Provisional Sinn deputy first minister at Stormont said  on January 22 that the visit by the Queen of England last year made an impact on  him and he would not rule out a meeting with the British Queen in the  future.

 

McGuinness attended a meeting at St James's Palace in London to promote  Northern Ireland (sic) last week. He said: "I've made it clear that the visit of  Queen Elizabeth of Britain to the south was something that we looked at with  considerable interest.

 

�I think the fact that she was prepared to recognise the importance of the  Irish language, that she was prepared to stand in a very dignified way to honour  those patriots who struggled in 1916 to bring about a free and independent  32-County Irish Republic, that made an impact upon me. So that's an issue that I  will ponder, and I wouldn't rule anything out.�

 

During the autumn's 26-County presidential election campaign, McGuinness  said he would be prepared to meet all heads of state "without exception" if he  was elected as the Republic's head of state.

 

13. Sell-off of 26-County State assets

 

THE 26-County Administration was called upon to honour a pre-election  pledge to retain assets under the responsibility of the State forestry agency  Coillte amid more speculation about the sell-off of State assets.

 

The State�s shares in Aer Lingus, ESB, Eirgrid, Coillte, Bord Gais and Bord  na Mona are all being considered in light of the need to raise revenue under the  bailout agreement with the European Union and the International Monetary  Fund.

 

The Irish Times reported on January 21 that the sell-off of stakes in Aer  Lingus, Coillte, Dublin Port, and Bord Gáis are being considered under a  list of assets drawn up by an inter-departmental group.

 

This list forms the basis of current discussions with the Troika � EU, IMF,  ECB � officials who are in Dublin assessing the implementation of Ireland�s  rescue package.

The Troika has long pushed for a sell-off of ?5 billion worth  of State assets while the programme for government stated a goal to raise ?2  billion through a sell-off �when market conditions are right�. It has already  agreed to sell-off a minority stake in ESB.

Sinn Féin�s spokesperson on  Natural Resources Martin Ferris today called on the government to honour a  pre-election pledge that Coillte and its land would not be sold off.

 

�Spokespersons for both the current government parties, including the  current Minister for Agriculture Simon Coveney, joined me in rejecting any such  sell off,� Ferris said.

�I am therefore calling on them to honour their  election pledge that Coillte, nor any of its land and forestry assets,  would not be sold off. Such a sale to private interests would represent a  shameful auction of a valuable and under-utilised natural resource.

�It would  also of course fly in the face of the government�s own stated objective of  retaining Coillte lands as part of a new public energy company.�

 

The sale of the government�s stake in Aer Lingus has been long mooted but  the government has sought to play down a fire sale of any asset in order to get  the best price for it.

 

The government has previously said it would not sell its 25 per cent stake  in the airline for less than ?1 per share � valuing it at over ?130 million in  total.

 

On January 17 reports in the media indicated that the State�s stake in Aer  Lingus is one of the assets earmarked for sale to raise revenue as part of the  EU/IMF bailout agreement.

According to the Irish Times, the 25% share in Aer  Lingus � valued at less than ?100 million � has been included in a list of  recommended assets for sale by an interdepartmental group established by the  government.

 

The group�s report was discussed with Troika officials in Dublin on January  19 for the �fifth review of the government�s adherence to the rescue package  deal�.

 

Demonstrators protesting at the handing over of ?1.25m by the state  assembled outside the Department of Finance and at the old Anglo Bank building  in Dublin on Wednesday January 25. Some of them �cemented� their hands into  barrels so they could not bbe easily removed.

 

14. The numbers that sum up modern smalltown Ireland

 

HERE are the lotto numbers � 42, 3, 9, 39,11, 37 .

 

In a town I know quite well, these are the numbers that are resonating this  week. Not because some local octogenarian who spends ?10 a week on her lucky dip  has won some obscene amount of money. No, the number resonates the opposite of  joy. These are the numbers that represent the new reality in small towns like  the one I am referring to. 

 

42 � That is the number of young men, men alone, who have left the parish  for Australia...since Christmas. The New Year is but a fortnight old and already  the heart and soul of that town has been ripped out. The local sports teams are  devastated. They do not know if they will be able to field this year, well,  field a competitive team anyway. There will always be young lads coming through,  but to take 42 out of the available pick, then you are left with no hope.  Indeed, the only hope is that every parish across the county is losing the same  number of young people. 

 

3 �That is the number of major businesses that closed...since this day last  week. Businesses that had been in the town for generations, two, three  generations. Businesses that gave to the town as well as benefited from it.  Businesses which knew good times over the past decade when young people, flush  with cash, opted to eat out every day rather than cook at home in their plush  apartments which have sprung up over the place. Gone, doors shut, staff let  go. 

 

9 � That is the number of people who have taken their own lives in the  general area over the last four or five years. Five of that number were since  last summer. Families are left numbed by it all. Not knowing what to say.  Friends are left shocked, wondering whether they fulfilled their duties. People  look at each other, struggling to find the words. 

 

37 � The number of families locally who each month wave good-bye to a  father or mother as he/she flies out of Knock Airport to commute to work on the  building sites of London. Young children find themselves growing up in a country  that has changed, in a household that has changed. Young children who knew  comfort and security but who are beginning to realise that not all is like it  used to be. 

 

11 � The number of months it has been since a property sold in that  town. 

 

39 � That is roughly the number of houses in the town in which electricity  does not shine a light at night. My source tells me that this is the number of  families who got their heat this winter from gas lamps bought in the local  discount supermarket, which by last week had sold out as the families continue  to buy them to see if they can get through the month of January without  succumbing to the cold, which thankfully did not come this year. They have all  had to stop paying their ESB bills, gas bills, so that mouths can be  fed. 

 

Did I mistakenly omit the bonus number. No, I didn�t. That�s just it. There  isn�t any bonus number for small town Ireland. 

 

 

15. Emigration in Ireland not �a free choice of lifestyle�

 

MICHAEL Noonan, 26-County minister for finance, said on January 19 that  most emigration by young Irish people is a �free choice of lifestyle� and played  down the impact of the country�s unemployment rate on people moving  abroad. 

 

�It�s a small island. A lot of people want to get off the island,� the  Dublin Finance Minister told the media at a briefing on the fifth quarterly  review of Ireland�s bailout programme by the Troika of the European Commission,  ECB and IMF. 

 

He pointed to the experience of his own family saying that three of his  five children are living abroad and that in their case it was a lifestyle choice  to move away from Ireland. 

The country�s unemployment rate is currently  14.3 per cent with over 180,000 classified as long-term claimants on the Live  Register. A recent survey found that four-in-ten people saw no future for  themselves in Ireland. 

 

Noonan said that unemployment was not driving emigration: �It�s not being  driven by unemployment at home, it�s being driven by a desire to see another  part of the world and live there.� 

 

Figures published last December showed that over 76,000 people had left the  country in the year to April 2011 � an increase of nearly 17 per cent � with  over half of those being Irish. 

 

�There are always young people coming and going from Ireland,� Noonan also  said while adding that the country needed to ensure that people leaving were  well enough educated to seek employment abroad. 

 

�What we have to make sure is that our young people have the best possible  education, right up to third level,� he said. 

 

16. Kilmihil�s missing generation 

 

A RECENT survey in Kilmihil has revealed that at least 87 people have  emigrated from the West Clare parish inside the last two years. The vast  majority of the recent emigrants are aged between 20 and 30. 

 

Gerry Johnson, one of the local people who put the figures together, has  said the deluge of emigrants from the community has led to Kilmihil losing a  generation of people. He maintains the current crisis is worse than emigration  figures from the parish in the 1980s. 

 

�We�re missing a generation in Kilmihil now. That generation is gone.  We�ve the younger people and the older ones like myself. But we�ve nothing in  between. 

 

�That�s basically what�s happening in Kilmihil. I think its way worse than  in the 1980s. Things weren�t as bad here as they are now. It�s lasting so long  this time and there�s no sign of it getting better,� Gerry  commented. 

 

�My own son, Neil, is 30 years of age and he�s just come home from  Australia. He was going out socialising recently and I asked him who was he  meeting? He said �I�ve no one to meet�. It�s that age group from 20 to 30 that  have left. They�re the age group that make things happen. They get involved in  every activity that�s happening in the parish,� he added. 

 

Approximately 50% of the recent emigrants from Kilmihil now live in  Australia while the remainder are based around the globe in England and other  parts of Europe, the US, Canada, South Korea and New Zealand. 

 

The collapse of the construction industry is a major factor in the high  emigration figures from the parish although a sizeable percentage of the  emigrants are female. In recent weeks, it has emerged that the Kilmihil ladies  senior football team may have to re-grade to intermediate, such is the impact of  emigration on their playing numbers. 

 

Prior to investigating how many people had left the parish, Gerry said he  believed the figure was significantly smaller than it is. 

 

�We had no idea. If someone had asked me �how many were gone?�, I�d have  said probably 15 or 20 people gone from Kilmihil was the maximum. I couldn�t  believe it. We�ve 16 male footballers lost and there are 10 of those senior  players who played in either 2010 or 2011. 

 

�To come up with a figure of almost 90 people who have left Kilmihil is  shocking. We�re only talking about 2010 and 2011. It�s frightening stuff. It�s  been devastating for the whole parish. It�s across the board devastation.�

 

Some entire families have emigrated, while Gerry is also fearful that the  figure of confirmed emigrants from Kilmihil may rise beyond 87. 

 

�We�re going to put these findings out to the broader community in Kilmihil  and find out the real figures. This is only going to get worse. There�s two or  three families I can think of where there�s six plus of that family emigrated.  That�s an unbelievable statistic. 

 

�When we did the calculation around Kilmihil to find out how many were  gone, it was really frightening,� he concluded. 

 

Ironically, the population of Kilmihil village rose by 8.3%, according to  preliminary 2011 census figures.  According to those figures, 627 people  lived in the village when the census was conducted.

-- Peter O'Connell, Clare  Champion newspaper.

 

17. The detention of IRA veteran Marian Price harks back to  internment

 

WRITING  in The Guardian on January 18, 2012 Éamonn McCann says that  the �detention of IRA veteran Marian Price harks back to internment�:

 

THE facts around Price's detention suggest she is being held not for any  crime, but from a belief the state is better off without her

 

Today, parole commissioners for Northern Ireland will decide whether to  order the release of the IRA veteran Marian Price from Maghaberry  prison. The 57-year-old has been held since last May, when the Northern Ireland  secretary, Owen Patterson, signed an order revoking her licence.

 

Her detention has been a scandal. Price has been effectively held in  solitary as the only female in the high-security prison, charged with  encouraging support for an illegal organisation. The charge arose from an Easter  Rising commemoration in Derry organised by the 32-county sovereignty movement �  widely regarded as the political voice of the Real IRA � during which she held  up the script from which a masked man read the Real IRA's "Easter  message".

 

Price was one of nine IRA volunteers sentenced to life for planting four  bombs in London, including one at the Old Bailey, in March 1973. Around 180  people were injured, mainly by flying glass. One man died from a heart attack.  The bombing party included Gerry Kelly, now a Sinn Féin minister at Stormont,  and Price's older sister, Dolours.

 

Price was freed in 1980 suffering from tuberculosis and anorexia and  weighing around five stone. Her lawyers insist that her release was based on a  royal pardon, which would mean that Patterson had no legal power to order her  detention. His intervention amounted to an egregious abuse reminiscent  of internment, they say. However, Patterson's lawyers say that �extensive  searches� have failed to locate the crucial document. A copy destroyed in 2010,  they have told the parole commissioners, turns out to have been the only copy  that existed, so its exact terms cannot be established. But, they add, the  �surrounding circumstances� of 1980 suggest that Price was not pardoned but  conditionally released.

 

Many are surprised that British authorities have not been able to come up  with a stronger case. Price's lawyers, Kevin Winters and Co, told the  commissioners in a submission on 4 January: �It is difficult to fathom how, even  exercising a modicum of care, this document was destroyed without someone,  before destruction, ensuring that the original (or at least another copy) was  still in existence ? There is certainly a foundation for suggesting that the  document may (and we can put it no higher) have been deliberately 'buried' given  the embarrassment it might cause.�

 

In court in Derry two days after her detention last year, despite strenuous  prosecution objections, she was granted bail, then immediately rearrested under  an order signed the previous evening. Her bail application had thus been made  meaningless by Patterson's advance arrangement to trump the court's decision if  it went against the state's wishes.

 

In the high-security jail where she is being held, Price was further  charged last July with �providing property for the purposes of terrorism� �  connected to the trial for the killing of two soldiers outside Massereene  barracks in Antrim in March 2009.

 

Price had been questioned for two days about this allegation in November  2009 and released without charge. There was no change in circumstances in the  interim and no new evidence offered. Again, over the objections of the state,  she was given bail and, again, returned to prison. It seems at the least a  reasonable suspicion that the new charge was designed to pre-empt the planned  challenge to Patterson's authority.

 

On Monday [January 16], Price appeared at Belfast magistrates  court on the same charge and was returned for trial. Again, despite bail  having been given on the charge in July, she was taken back to prison.

 

The facts of Price's detention, taken together, suggest she is being held  indefinitely not because there is evidence that she is guilty of serious crime,  but because the Northern Ireland Office believes the state is better off with  her out of the way � that, in everyday language, she is in internment. We  thought we were done with that in Northern Ireland. Marian Price should be freed  forthwith.

-- Éamonn McCann, The Guardian, January 18, 2012.

 

18. Hunger-striker's daughter denounces Provisionals

 

IN an interview with Suzanne Breen for the Sunday World newspaper on  January 15, daughter of H-Block hunger-striker Mickey Devine from Derry attacked  the Provisional leadership, saying her father �died for nothing�.

 

Louise Devine says she's �sickened� that the party top brass allegedly  rejected a secret British offer which could have saved the last six  hunger-strikers' lives � including her father's.

 

The claim that a substantial British proposal was on the table � first made  by ex-Blanketman Richard O'Rawe � was confirmed by recently released British  state papers.

Louise Devine is now demanding an urgent meeting with Gerry  Adams, Martin McGuinness and other key Republicans who ran the hunger-strike  from the outside.

"I want answers. I'm asking them to meet me face-to-face.  They owe me that at the very least," she told the Sunday World newspaper on  January 15.

 

�I was just five-years-old when I watched my daddy die in agony in a  H-Block slum.

 

�I sat on his bed and he couldn't even see me and my brother because he was  blind. I remember the tears running down his face as we left him for the last  time."�

 

The Devines are the first family of a dead hunger-striker to denounce the  Sinn Féin leadership following recent revelations.

 

�There's now a mountain of evidence backing Richard O'Rawe's claim that the  British made an offer effectively granting four of the prisoners' five demands  and that this offer was accepted by the IRA's prison leadership but rejected by  the outside leadership,� Louise says.

 

�Had the British proposal been accepted, my father would be alive today.  Instead he spent 60 agonising days as his body wasted away on hunger-strike.

 

�He died for nothing because the British were already willing to meet  nearly all the prisoners' demands.�

 

[Provisional] Sinn Féin strongly denies allegations an offer existed which  could have saved the men's lives and it unnecessarily prolonged the  hunger-strike for electoral gain.

 

But Louise (35) says she's �beyond anger� at those republicans who  reportedly rejected the offer: �How do they live with themselves?

 

�They knew the suffering the hunger-strikers endured and the filth and  squalor in which they lived. They're cold, heartless men.�

 

Mickey Devine, a 27-year-old father of two � know as 'Red Mickey' because  of his bright red hair and left-wing politics � was the last of the 10  hunger-strikers to die.

 

Louise claims [Provisional] Sinn Féin didn't inform her father, nor the  INLA of which he was a member, of the secret British offer. �Had daddy known, he  would have ended his hunger-strike.

 

�He was a young man with two children he adored and less than two years  left to serve in jail. He'd everything to live for.�

 

Mother-of-five Louise stresses she's �very proud� of her father and his  sacrifice: �He died for his comrades. But the knowledge that he didn't need to  is destroying me.�

 

She's calling for an independent public inquiry into the hunger-strike:  �[Provisional] Sinn Féin demands inquiries into everything that suits them.  Let's see if they agree to this.�

 

Louise was just five months' old  when her father was arrested for arms' possession in 1977. �As a baby, the  prison officers searched my nappy on visits to Long Kesh.

 

�When I was older, I hated visiting the jail. The screws were very  aggressive to Blanketmen's children.� Louise's parents' marriage broke up when  her father was in prison but she and her brother continued seeing him.

 

�When he was on the dirty protest, I was afraid of him at first," she  admits. "Here was this skinny, smelly man with a beard wearing an old army  blanket � and people told me he was my daddy.

 

�I cried and threw a tantrum, refusing to sit on his knee during one visit,  and he looked so sad.�

 

But Louise says her father did everything possible to reach out to her and  her brother, Michael Óg: �He couldn't buy us presents in jail so he made us  hankies. They were all he could give us.�

 

She breaks down in tears as she shows the Sunday World one hankie. On it,  her father has drawn Mickey Mouse, Tom and Jerry, the Seven Dwarfs and other  cartoon characters.

�To Louise and Michael from Daddy," Mickey Devine has  lovingly written.�

 

Another hankie shows her father and his comrades with faces like monkeys.  �Despite everything he was suffering, he was trying to make his kids laugh. He  loved us that much,� Louise says.

 

She remembers, in graphic detail, visiting her dying father in the prison  hospital. She was only five-years-old and her brother was eight.

 

�Daddy was lying in bed, covered in bed sores, and in terrible pain. I  climbed onto the bed to be near him and my Aunt Margaret said, 'Get down, you'll  hurt him.'

 

�But daddy said in this wee weak voice you could hardly hear, 'She's all  right, let her be.' He was just delighted I wasn't scared of him anymore. He  held me close and I was so happy.�

 

But Louise is riddled with guilt  too: �I remember somebody feeling sorry for me and giving me a bag of cheese and  onion crisps when I was on the bus going to the jail.

 

�I visited daddy stinking of those crisps. How selfish that was of me when  he was starving.

 

�The prison authorities kept a bowl of fruit by his bed. I longed for the  big red shiny apple. I knew not to take it but I feel guilty for even wanting  it.�

 

Her last visit to her dying father was heart-breaking: �Daddy's organs were  collapsing. There was a terrible smell of his rotting flesh as his body broke  down.

 

�He was blind so he couldn't see me or my brother. We sat beside him and he  was told, �Michael is on your left and Louise is on your right'� He held our  hands and then he reached up and felt the shape of our faces.

 

�I remember his cold, skinny hand on my flesh. He mumbled words to us which  I couldn't understand. He was drifting in and out of consciousness. His eyes  were half open. As we left, tears streamed down his face.

 

�Michael and I should have been allowed to stay with him to the end. At his  wake, I wouldn't leave his coffin.�

 

The children were woken at 8am on August 20 1981 to be told that their  father was dead. They were terrified as the INLA fired shots over his coffin. At  the graveside, they threw red roses on his coffin.

 

The rest of Louise's childhood was �hell�, she says: �Michael and I were  bullied at school. 'Your daddy rubbed shit on his cell wall', 'Your da starved  himself to death', other kids shouted.

 

�We'd come home crying and not go back to school for a week.� On her  birthday, first communion and Christmas, she'd envy other children �with their  intact families and perfect lives�.

 

Mickey Devine's own life � even before prison � was tragic. When he was 11,  his father died of leukaemia. A few years later, he came home to find his mother  dead from a massive brain tumour.

 

�Daddy had no family,� says Louise. �I've five children. My wee boy Caolan  is the image of his grandfather with his red hair and sense of humour. I just  want daddy here now to be part of my family. But we've been robbed of him and  he's been robbed of us.�

-- Suzanne Breen, Sunday World, January 15,  2012.

 

19. The Boston College IRA tapes controversy -- a reply to Niall  O�Dowd

 

Editor�s Note (Irish Central): Niall O�Dowd�s Periscope  column recently criticised the handling of the IRA interviews for the  Boston College  archives which are now being sought by Northern Ireland  (sic) authorities. Here, journalist Ed Moloney and academic and activist Anthony  McIntyre, who conducted those interviews, give their side of the story.

 

THERE is clear evidence that Niall O�Dowd does not know �full well� the  background to Boston College�s Belfast Project. And on the basis of not knowing  �full well� he pumps out a piece riddled with errors. What evidence O�Dowd has  found is as clear as the mud he seeks to sling.

 

This is somewhat unfortunate because for a while Niall O�Dowd strongly  opposed the British government�s efforts to invade Boston College�s oral history  archive. Now he has opted to say nothing about the British and instead seeks to  exonerate Boston College and the American courts. All in the dubious service of  blaming the researcher and project director.

 

Quoting from a �Boston College affidavit�, which was not in fact a Boston  College affidavit, O�Dowd writes:

 

 �Prior to the commencement of the project, Robert K O�Neill, the  Burns librarian (where the tapes were to be housed) cautioned Moloney that  although he had not spoken yet with Boston College�s counsel, the library could  not guarantee the confidentiality of the interviews in the face of a court  order.�

 

The striking aspect of this and other parts of his May 2000 fax to Ed  Moloney - which O�Dowd fails to cite - is that it is clearly O�Neill�s  preliminary judgement of the legal situation. For instance, he went on to say:  �Nevertheless, the First Amendment to our Constitution is greatly cherished  here, and I suspect the courts would look upon these interviews as privileged  information.� Our need for firm guarantees was one reason why the project was  not started in the summer of 2000 but was delayed a further eight months. We  required very specific assurances and we waited until we got them. When Boston  College finally came back with those assurances, which it later provided  separately to the loyalist side of the project, the green light was given.

 

And what were the loyalists assured? We were not directly involved in their  deliberations but some of their number had face-to-face meetings with senior  college staff in Belfast and in their own words, these representatives of Boston  College:

 

... from day one, gave guarantees that were directly related to the  interest this material would have from the PSNI. (BC staff)?gave these  guarantees formally as official representatives of BC and did so putting on the  line the integrity of this unrivalled Irish Studies collection in this  illustrious academic institution. At every meeting subsequently, discussion  centred around how the project was coming along and every time that discussion  touched upon how none of this could have happened without the iron clad  guarantees that predicated the whole thing.

 

O�Dowd then proceeds to cite Boston College spokesperson Jack Dunn�s  assertion that �an agreement was signed between Boston College and Ed Moloney  that stated that each interviewee is to be given a contract guaranteeing  confidentiality to the extent that American law allows.�

 

While this is not in dispute, it seems to be a late in the day fallback  position adopted by Boston College to shift the blame onto to other shoulders.  Their position when the court case began last May was substantially different.  As the Boston-based lawyer Ted Folkman points out at Letters Blogatory: �in its  motion to quash the subpoena, Boston College did not suggest that the promise of  confidentiality was a promise only to the extent permitted by American  law�.

 

That aside, one would expect the contract drawn up by Boston College to  have this health warning, if that indeed is what it was, written clearly and  unambiguously into the confidentiality contract. So what exactly did this donor  agreement say?

 

The donor agreement signed by interviewees stated:

 

�Access to the tapes and transcripts shall be restricted until after my  death except in those cases where I have provided prior written approval for  their use following consultation with the Burns Librarian, Boston College. Due  to the sensitivity of content, the ultimate power of release shall rest with me.  After my death the Bums Librarian of Boston College may exercise such power  exclusively.�

 

There was no caveat in the contract drawn up by Boston College�s attorneys  stating that the type of confidentiality it guaranteed would not withstand a  court order. Clearly BC�s legal opinion was that it was unnecessary. Otherwise  why not insert the caveat if the type of confidentiality stipulated in the  contract in any way clashed with American law?�

 

O�Dowd goes on to approvingly cite Jack Dunn of Boston College who argued  that his �good friends in Ireland seem to lack a fundamental understanding of  the American legal process.�

 

That is true. We are not lawyers. Boston College has its own law school and  legal counsel yet for all of that it seems not to have understood the American  legal process. When we, who �did not understand� American law, warned Boston  College that a second subpoena could be imminent, we were told that would not  happen. And the reason given later: �?practiced lawyers ? people who were  formally schooled in international law� had ruled out that eventuality. A second  subpoena duly arrived. So much for Boston College�s knowledge of American  law.

 

Furthermore, in a September 2011 email a Boston College official said in  respect of the subpoena �the action of the PSNI Special Crimes Division was  totally unexpected.� A very definitive statement. But how could it be �totally  unexpected� if Boston College�s position is that it always felt the archive  might not withstand a court order? Boston College was �totally� surprised  because the PSNI action flew �totally� in the face of its own legal  counsel.

 

O�Dowd further argues that we are now �defending the indefensible.� How is  protecting the interviewees who took part in this project indefensible? Is he  suggesting that we should have abandoned them?

 

Finally, Niall O�Dowd repeats a hoary old canard when he states that the  interviewees were all opponents of Gerry Adams. How on earth would he know? Does  he know who we interviewed? Of course not. The project was designed to increase  knowledge of republican history and interviewees were chosen for their knowledge  not their biases.  Ultimately, if the archive survives and is eventually  made available the public will judge for itself the academic integrity of the  project.

-- Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre,

-- Published in the online  Irish Central news outlet, Thursday, January 19, 2012.

 

20. US judge finds no basis to stop release of IRA interviews

 

A FEDERAL judge ruled on January 24 that the two men who conducted research  and interviews for Boston College�s oral history project on the Troubles had no  legal standing to challenge the release of some of the taped recordings of  former IRA members.

 

Ed Moloney, the journalist and author who directed the so-called Belfast  Project, and Anthony McIntyre, the writer and former IRA prisoner who  interviewed 26 former IRA members for it, had argued that release of the  interviews would endanger the lives of McIntyre and his family, who live in  Drogheda, and those interviewed.

 

They also argued that US attorney general Eric Holder had improperly  allowed the US justice department to seek the tapes on behalf of British  authorities without regard to the political damage the disclosures could have on  the peace process.

 

During a special sitting of the US District Court, held coincidentally at  Boston College Law School, Judge William Young said the mutual legal assistance  treaty between the US and UK did not allow for such intervention.

 

�On the merits, I find the attorney general has acted appropriately . . .  under this treaty,� the judge said.

 

James Cotter, one of the attorneys representing Ed Moloney and Anthony  McIntyre, told the judge they had hoped he would allow the case to go forward so  they could put witnesses on the stand to show the threat posed to �the free flow  of information�. Among those hoping to testify were academics worried about the  future of oral history projects.

 

Anthony McIntyre�s wife, Carrie Twomey, who is American, attended the  hearing but did not testify as the arguments were limited to lawyers. Ms Twomey  spent the last week lobbying congressional leaders to pressure the US government  to drop the case, which it took at the request of the RUC/PSNI investigating the  1972 IRA murder and secret burial of Jean McConville, a Belfast  mother-of-10.

 

While the Moloney and McIntyre legal challenge suffered a setback, it made  political progress. Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts, chairman of the Senate  Foreign Relations Committee, wrote to US secretary of state Hillary Clinton,  asking her to revoke the British request for the Boston College tapes.

 

�I am obviously concerned about the impact it may have on the continued  success of the Northern Ireland peace process,� he wrote. �It is possible that  some former parties to the conflict may perceive the effort by the UK  authorities to obtain this information as contravening the spirit of the Good  Friday accords.�

 

There was no immediate response from Mrs Clinton�s office.

 

Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre said they would appeal Judge Young�s  finding that they had no legal standing, along with the rest of the case, before  the US First Circuit Court of Appeals.

 

In a statement released last night, researchers Ed Moloney and Anthony  McIntyre said: �This afternoon�s judgment in Boston comes as no surprise.  However, we will appeal Judge Young�s decision, along with the rest of our case,  which will be heard in the US Court of Appeals in March when we expect a much  more positive outcome.�

The researchers say they welcome Judge Young�s  remarks about the Belfast Project, quoting him as saying: �I�ve read thousands  of pages of the transcripts. This was a bona fide academic exercise of  considerable intellectual merit.�

 

Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre describe the judge�s comments as �the  answer to those of our critics in Ireland who have labelled the Belfast Project  �an anti-Adams exercise�.�

He added: �They have not read the interviews �  Judge Young has.�

 

21. Free Marian Price and Martin Corey: PFC

 

The Pat Finucane Centre (PFC) is arguing for the release of Belfast woman  Marian Price and Lurgan man Martin Corey from Maghaberry jail on the basis that  both are effectively interned without trial - contrary to all domestic and  international human rights standards.

 

Ms. Price was sent to jail last May by an order of the British Northern  Ireland (sic) Secretary, Owen Paterson, after holding a script for a masked  representative of the "Real IRA" to read at a 32 County Sovereignty Movement  Easter commemoration.

 

Paterson has revoked the licence releasing her almost 30 years earlier from  a life sentence for the 1973 IRA bombing of the Old Bailey. Her lawyers say she  was freed from that sentence on the basis of a royal pardon which supersedes  Paterson's powers and which, anyhow, appears to have been shredded.

 

Ms. Price, aged 57, who is seriously unwell and in constant pain, has now  spent eight months in Maghaberry, in solitary confinement, not having been  convicted of any crime.  We are currently awaiting news from the  Independent Parole Commissioners about her possible release.

 

Similarly, the PFC is concerned at the continued detention of Lurgan man,  Martin Corey, aged 61, who also remains behind bars - also without being tried  or convicted of any crime. 

 

Convicted of a double murder in December 1973, he was sentenced to life  imprisonment at the age of 19, spending the next 19 years in jail before his  release, on licence, in June 1992. 

 

On 16 April 2010 he was taken back into custody, the only reason so far  given that he is a "security risk" citing allegations that he is a dissident  republican.  His legal team have described this "evidence" as "closed  material".

 

Corey has begun a judicial review against the Independent Parole  Commissioners on the basis of the alleged secrecy surrounding the reasons,  citing a lack of detail on the evidence used which makes it impossible for him  to appeal.

 

His solicitor says the European Court of Human Rights and the House of  Lords have both made it clear that details must be given in such  circumstances.  A full hearing is due in March.

 

The PFC's view is that the politics of both prisoners are irrelevant, that  their rights are being ignored and both should be released forthwith.   Anyone who shares this view is encouraged to write to Owen Paterson at  Stormont.

 

23. Israel passes law tantamount to internment

 

In a statement on January 12, Geraldine McNamara PRO of Republican  Sinn

Fein said that it is an affront to humanity that the Israeli parliament  has passed the �Prevention of Infiltration Law�, which mandates the automatic  detention of anyone,

including asylum-seekers, who enters Israel without  permission.

 

This law allows for detention without trail or internment without trial as  we know it for people from many countries who could be considered by Israel to  be hostile.

 

This law criminalises refugees and asylum seekers and they can be detained  indefinitely.

Families can be detained including children she said.

 

People from Islamic countries are especially targeted by this law which  flies in the face of human rights and is against international law on the  treatment of refugees and asylum seekers Geraldine said.

 

The 1951 Refugee Convention was drawn up following World War II in the wake  of mass forced displacement of Jewish and other war refugees fleeing  persecution.

 

Considering most Israeli�s come from a background where they sought refuge  in other countries including the present Israeli state this law can be deemed  nothing more that sectarian and racist.

 

Many Irish people have experienced the effects of internment without trial  and what it is like to live in a sectarian state in the occupied six counties,  this internment and occupation continues today and at present Martin Corey and  Marian Price are detained indefinitely without trail without even a valid reason  for their internment.

 

This action by Israel must be highlighted and its injustice told to the  world Geraldine said.

 

Remember when we stand idly by against injustice we cannot expect anyone to  stand by us when injustice comes our way.


 


 


back to index page

National Irish Freedom Committee, P.O. Box 770549, Woodside, NY 11377

 Website: www. irishfreedom.net   --  Email: nifcmem@optonline.net

The NIFC does not accept responsibility for the content of linked websites